Home

  Current reviews
  Archives
  Reviews by title
  Reviews by author
  Interviews

  Contact Onyx

  Discussion forum

 

Onyx reviews: Atonement by Ian McEwan

There is no atonement for God, or novelists, Briony Tallis writes in the closing pages of Atonement. This is because novelists have the ultimate power of deciding outcomes.

Briony has much to atone for. Her actions in the summer of 1935, when she was thirteen, profoundly affected her family's future. Ian McEwan masterfully constructs a series of seemingly innocent and unrelated events that ultimately become an unopposable pressure converging on the crime Briony commits that evening. Readers are aware of the impending crime—it is told on the dust jacket—and it is useful knowledge. McEwan is miserly in revealing details. He teases readers with foreshadowings that lend desperate urgency to his story. A crime seems unthinkable in this pastoral setting.

Atonement is a Merchant-Ivory kind of story. It begins in a rural British estate where numerous arrivals lead to momentous events. Briony's sister, Cecilia, has returned from Cambridge with a third-class diploma. Cecilia's lifelong friend, Robby, abandoned by his father, also returns with a first-class degree and aspirations of medical school. Briony's brother Leon is also scheduled to arrive, bringing an ambitious friend with ideas on how to capitalize on the inevitable war. Also new in the household are Briony's cousins, refugees from a bitter domestic civil war. Briony's mother, Emily, has been in fragile health since Briony's birth—she spends afternoons cloistered in her room to ward off the threat of migraines. Briony's father is rarely present, using the excuse of a demanding Civil Service job to remain in London.

The events that lead to Briony's crime are simple and unassuming. She has written a play to celebrate Leon's arrival and is intent upon having her cousins play in it. This will help distract them from their dislocation and uncertain future. The disintegration of the play, a broken vase, a misdirected letter, misinterpreted actions seen from afar and juvenile caprice collide at the end of the twenty-four period which makes up the first half of Atonement.

McEwan lets the story evolve slowly and naturally, showing readers events from numerous viewpoints. In doing this, he demonstrates how individual preconceptions cloud understanding of what is going on. Without delving intimately inside the minds of any one character, he skillfully describes their thought patterns, the sometimes-tenuous chains of reasoning that lead to conclusions. He shows how several people can observe an event and construct totally different interpretations. Chillingly, he discloses how quickly someone's life can be ruined by such misinterpretations.

After the events of 1935, Atonement leaps forward to a grueling World War II vignette as three soldiers flee on foot across France, part of the British retreat against the unstoppable German advance and the deadly Luftwaffe Stukas that strafe soldiers and innocents alike. The men are bound for Dunkirk, where they hope to find passage back to England.

Briony Tullis is now a nurse. As part of her atonement, she gave up going to college as her sister had. Her hospital is preparing to receive the first wave of injured soldiers being returned from the continent. In another twenty-four-hour period, she undergoes the transition from probationer to fully seasoned nurse. Thoughts of the injury her actions caused are never far from her, though.

Writers—and Briony Tullis has pursued her aspirations to be a novelist—have no atonement, though, because they have the power to control their character's outcome. In a bittersweet finale, McEwan observes Briony fifty years on, confronting her own mortality and reveals the extent to which he has controlled the outcome of the Tullis family.


Web site and all contents © Copyright Bev Vincent 2007. All rights reserved.